| TonyGists App 3 Out Now. Download from Play store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.TonyGists.TonyGistsapp |
At least three policemen and others have been sentenced to death by a court in Akwa Ibom.
File photo
An Akwa Ibom State High Court Uyo presided by Justice Joy Unwana
(extended jurisdiction) has handed down death sentence to 7 persons,
including 3 policemen for kidnapping, according to a report by
TheNation.
The other 4 convicts include a woman hired by the gang for N50, 000
to cook for the victim, Deaconess Ime Anietie Ekanem, while they
negotiated for her ransom.
The state instituted suit No HU/13c/2012 against 8 members of the
gang in 2012. They are: Cpl Emmanuel Charlie, Ekaette Edet Moses,
Fidelis Emmanson Jeremiah, Cpl Bassey Sunday (377812), PC Mfon Bassey
(478463), Ndu Okon Johnny, Unyime Edem Etukakpan, and Itohowo Godwin
Akpakwa.
They were convicted on all 3 count charges of Conspiracy to commit
felony, kidnapping, and Counseling, aiding and sponsoring kidnapping.
According to the confessional statement of the 8th accused, Mrs.
Itohowo Akpakwa, which was admitted as exhibit, she confessed to
visiting her friend in a bar at Idakeyop Aka where she gave the 7th
accused, Unyime Edem Etukakpan money to buy medicine for his ill health.
Though Akpakwa denied knowledge of the plot to kidnap her friend
and neighbour, no fewer than 3 other members of the gang told court that
they did not know her name at the time she visited the final meeting at
Aka.
They insisted that she was the one who identified her friend and gave direction to her house in Obio Etoi village, Uyo.
It was learnt that the victim was dragged out of the Toyota Sienna
Car driven by the husband, in front of the family house at about 6.30 PM
and whisked away in a Volvo Wagon Car to Afaha Udoeyop in Ibesikpo
Asutan council area where she was kept, under armed guards, in an
isolated building pending agreement and payment of Ransom.
The anti-kidnapping unit of the state CID swung into action as
telephone negotiations between the kidnappers and the victim’s husband
brought down the initial demand from more than N20m to about N1.8
million to be paid on 2 installments.
Plain clothed operatives of the State CID were shocked to discover
that the first two persons who approached the Afaha Ibesikpo
Marketsquare venue for the ransom delivery were their colleagues at the
state CID.
Shortly after the encounter, the change in venue for delivery of the ransom was relayed to the husband of the victim by phone.
Police investigation report, it was gathered, indicated that after
thrice changing venue, the first installment of N800,000 was delivered
at Itam in another local government area.
From the totality of evidence before the Court, it was observed
that the gang might have gotten away with the crime had the proceed been
equitably shared.
It was also revealed that serious disagreement in the sharing formula led to friction.
A member of the gang, who at the time of sharing, was in the Uyo
Prison on a different criminal matter, returned home to discover that he
was short-changed.
He then gave details of the plot and how it was carried out to the police, and later became the star witness for the State.
The 8th and only accused who escaped the capital punishment, Mrs
Itohowo Akpakwa- a staff of the University of Uyo, was earlier granted
bail.
Samuel Ikpo Esq of counsel to Mrs Akpakwa had insisted that there
was no reason his client should languish in prison when there is no
direct evidence linking her to the commission of the alleged crime.
Her bail was secured when Ikpo successfully argued that in the
absence of a prima facie evidence against his client, it became baseless
and punitive to curtail her freedom.
Inspite of persistent argument to the contrary by Eyo Asuquo Esq
for state, insisting Mrs Akpakwa is the ‘woman’ mentioned by other
suspects, the court was not persuaded, and therefore had no grounds to
deny her bail.
Reviewing arguments on both side, the court noted that evidence of
most suspects was that the woman who attended their meeting at Aka
before the kidnap operation was the one who identified the victim and
also supplied information about her residence and movement. It noted
that 2 state witnesses (policemen) also confirmed to court that they
heard from suspects the 8th accused supplied information and also
identified the victim.
Justice (Mrs) Joy Unwana echoed the position of Samuel Ikpo who
pointed out that hearsay evidence by state state witnesses must not only
be discountenanced but that of other suspects who did not mention the
name of his client.
Furthermore, the court was convinced by his position that in the
failure of police to conduct Identification Parade to give other
suspects the opportunity to identify the ‘woman’ they allegedly saw, his
client cannot be declared as the ‘woman’ in question.
The court was of the view that there was no grounds to convict Mrs Akpakwa, and accordingly discharged and acquited her.
On the other hand, convinced that the state has successfully proven
beyond reasonable doubt, the 3 count charges, the other 7 were
convicted.
|
Are You On youtube? subscribe to Hot GIST Channel Latest Updates - @Hot Gist
Are You On youtube? subscribe to Gospel World (which is also owned by Tony Gists) youtube Channel Latest Updates - @Gospel world
Are you on audio mack? Follow Tonygists on audio mack to listen and download to the latest Mfm sermons Latest Updates - @Tonygists
Follow Tonygists on LinkedIn to get more jobs opportunities Latest Updates - @Tonygists
Are You On youtube? subscribe to Honest Ose Channel Latest Updates - @Honest Ose
Are You On youtube? subscribe to Honest Web Solutions Channel Latest Updates - @Honest Web Solutions
Are You On youtube? subscribe to Xtremely Honest Channel Latest Updates - @Xtremely Honest
Are You On Twitter? Follow Us Now For Latest Updates - @tonygists
Are You On FACEBOOK? Like Our Page For Latest Updates - tonygists
Are You On FACEBOOK? Join Our Group For Latest Updates And Interactions - TonyGists
© 2024 Tonygists | Portions are © 2024 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may be published, broadcast, rewritten, or distributed.
